NEW EBOOK AVAILABLE!

50 Small-Sided Games by Football Coaching Lab
Get it now in our eBook store!

Top view photo of a soccer field divided into several small-sided games to optimize training efficiency.

Smaller Fields, Bigger Impact: The Power of Small-Sided Games

CATEGORY: SPORT SCIENCE

AUTHOR: FABIAN KLINGNER

READING TIME: 6 MINUTES

When training feels like the game, players learn faster. Small-sided games bring realism, rhythm, and involvement back to every session.

There are thousands of drills out there. But many of them, while organized and technical, miss the heartbeat of the real game. Too often, players stand in line waiting for their turn or repeat isolated patterns that barely resemble what happens in a match. That’s fine when you’re teaching the absolute fundamentals. Repetition helps players build confidence and clean technique. But once those basics are in place, training should start to feel more and more like the game itself.

That’s where small-sided games (SSGs) come in: simple, flexible formats that can turn every drill into a dynamic, game-like learning environment.

Why “Game Realism” Matters

In modern coaching, the most effective exercises combine technical, tactical, physical, and mental elements. When players face real opponents, make decisions under pressure, and move through game-like situations, the skills they practice are far more likely to transfer to match performance.

Researchers call this idea “ecological validity.” It simply means: Does your drill represent what actually happens in a game? If the answer is yes, you’re not just training technique – you’re training perception, decision-making, and timing too.

SSGs naturally tick all those boxes. With fewer players, reduced space, and adjusted rules, they recreate the demands of the full game but with more intensity, more touches, and more involvement for everyone.

What Exactly Are Small-Sided Games?

Small-sided games are modified versions of the real game. For example, a 4v4 soccer match, a 3v3 handball setup, or a 2v2 volleyball game. You shrink the playing area, reduce the number of players, and sometimes tweak the rules, but you keep the essence of the sport intact: opponents, goals, transitions, and scoring.

This is what makes them so powerful. A well-designed SSG is not a “mini version” of the game, it is the game, just scaled down.

The Dutch researcher Sigrid Olthof has shown that one of the keys to realism is “match-derived relative pitch area” (RPA). In simple terms: when you reduce the number of players, make sure each still has roughly the same amount of space as they would in a real match. That way, spacing, timing, and tactical behaviors remain realistic.

  • image list item
    Illustration showing a comparison of playing field sizes from 5-on-5 to 11-on-11 in soccer.

The Benefits of Small-Sided Games

Apart from replicating real match conditions, small-sided games offer several key advantages over full 11v11 matches or isolated drills:

Physical Fitness - SSGs naturally boost heart rate, sprinting, and acceleration. Meta-studies show they can improve aerobic and anaerobic fitness as effectively as traditional running drills, but with the added bonus of skill work and decision-making. The beauty? You can control intensity easily. Want more load? Use larger spaces or limit touches. Want more recovery? Go smaller and slower.

Technical Development - More Touches, Better Skill. In SSGs, players are constantly involved. Every few seconds, they pass, shoot, or defend. That’s far more ball contact than in classic drills. This repetition under real pressure is where technical improvement sticks.

Tactical Awareness - With constant transitions, SSGs develop players’ scanning, anticipation, and spacing. Olthof’s work shows that adjusting pitch size and player numbers directly changes how teams move and organize, just like in a full game.

Psychological Engagement -  Everyone’s Involved. Every player has a role. No standing, no waiting. This sense of continuous participation boosts motivation, communication, and confidence, especially in younger athletes.

Even major associations have recognized these advantages. The German Football Association (DFB), for instance, has introduced official 3v3 tournament formats for its youngest age groups (U6–U9), precisely because small-sided games keep every child active, increase decision-making opportunities, and replicate the real dynamics of the game. It’s a powerful sign that the future of development lies in smaller, more game-realistic formats.

Designing Effective Small-Sided Games

Over the past decade, plenty of research has explored how coaches can design and manipulate small-sided games to make them both game-realistic and goal-specific. Studies from soccer, handball, and basketball consistently show that by tweaking variables such as player numbers, pitch size, rules, or scoring systems, coaches can precisely shape the intensity, decision-making load, and tactical focus of an exercise. In other words, SSGs aren’t just smaller versions of the real game — they’re flexible tools that let you emphasize certain elements while keeping the authentic rhythm and flow of play intact.

When designing a small-sided game, four simple points should be kept in mind:

  1. Keep what makes it a game: Always include opponents, direction, and a scoring goal. Remove any of these, and you lose realism.

  2. Adjust, don’t over-control: Use constraints that guide behavior, not ones that kill creativity. Change player numbers (3v3, 5v5, 7v7). Adjust space per player. Add rules like limited touches, bonus goals, or time challenges to emphasize specific tactics.

  3. Match the group’s age and level: Younger teams benefit from tight spaces and frequent ball contact; older or advanced players need larger areas for tactical depth.

  4. Observe and adapt Watch how players react — does the setup create the situations you want? Track simple data like heart rate, RPE, passes, or goals. Over time, tweak dimensions and rules to match your goals.

Adjusting small-sided games to fit your training goals is easily done by following a few simple principles:

  • More intensity: Increase space per player or add time constraints.

  • More technical focus: Shrink the area, reduce touches, or reward precision.

  • More tactical focus: Add neutral players, create overloads, or use multiple goals.

  • More decision-making: Keep defenders live and vary scoring rules.

A simple rule of thumb: design with the game in mind — not with cones in mind.

Conclusion – Small Games, Big Impact

Small-sided games are more than fun drills. They are evidence-based, game-realistic tools that develop fitness, technique, and tactics in one go. When designed well, they make training look, feel, and play like the real thing.

Coaches don’t need high-tech tools to start, just thoughtful design and consistency. But for those who want to plan, track, and analyze their SSGs systematically, tools like planet.training’s Session Planner and the drill library make it easy to record variations, monitor intensity, and evaluate performance over time.

Small format. Big learning. That’s the power of SSGs.


Main sources used

  • Olthof, S. B. H., Frencken, W. G. P., & Lemmink, K. A. P. M. (2018). Match-derived relative pitch area changes the physical and team tactical performance of elite soccer players in small-sided soccer games. Journal of Sports Sciences, 36(4), 393-401. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2017.1403412

  • Clemente, F. M., Afonso, J., & Sarmento, H. (2021). Small-sided games: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. PLoS ONE, 16(2), e0247067. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247067

  • Aguiar, M., Botelho, G., Lago-Peñas, C., Maçãs, V., & Sampaio, J. (2012). A review on the effects of soccer small-sided games. Journal of Human Kinetics, 33, 103-113. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078-012-0049-x

  • Fernández-Espínola, C., Abad Robles, M. T., & Giménez Fuentes-Guerra, F. J. (2020). Small-sided games as a methodological resource for team sports teaching: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), 1884. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061884

  • Sarmento, H., Clemente, F. M., Harper, L. D., Costa, I. T. da, Owen, A., & Figueiredo, A. J. (2018). Small-sided games in soccer – a systematic review. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 18(5), 693-749. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2018.1517288

  • Mills, G. (2024). Age and stage approach to training area sizes in youth football using relative pitch area (RPA). Strength & Conditioning Journal, 107 mins. [Online Article] https://www.isspf.com/articles/best-training-area-size-for-youth-football-using-rpa/

  • Nunes, N. A., Santos, F., Coutinho, D., Olthof, S., & Sampaio, M. (2025). Coaches’ perspectives of the use of small-sided games in the professional soccer training environment. Journal of Kinesiology and Exercise Sciences, 35(109), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.9610

  • Endriani, D., Gultom, S., Destya, M. R., & Nadzalan, A. bin M. (2024). Mapping the landscape of small-sided games in team sports: A bibliometric analysis and literature review. SportArea, 9(2), 16513. https://doi.org/10.25299/sportarea.2024.vol9(2).16513

  • Michailidis, Y. (2012). Small-sided games in soccer training. EFSU-PIT Journal of Physical Education & Sport, 12(1), 93-102.

bg image //a.storyblok.com/f/73553/1920x1080/80156ef8d2/pt-best-coaching-app-banner.jpgbg image //a.storyblok.com/f/73553/1920x1080/80156ef8d2/pt-best-coaching-app-banner.jpg

WE ELEVATE YOUR GAME

Start free trial

*No payment info required